Survival rate of ART restorations with high-viscosity GIC versus conventional RM-GIC [October 13, 2018]
Subscribe to read and download this work.
Search result: Only two clinical studies concerning restorations were found.
Clinical outcomes: The results indicate no difference in the survival rate after 12 and 24 months.
[‘Preliminary Systematic Literature Searches’ are based on SYSTEM’s periodic systematic searches of the dental literature and provide first overviews over existing clinical evidence but are limited in the number of databases searched, as well as the assessment of precision and internal validity of results and thus do not replace the need for a full systematic review report to the topic]
Reviews
No reviews yet.
APA
Mickenautsch, S. (2026). Survival rate of ART restorations with high-viscosity GIC versus conventional RM-GIC [October 13, 2018]. Afribary. Retrieved June 14, 2026, from http://library.afribary.com/works/survival-rate-of-art-restorations-with-high-viscosity-gic-versus-conventional-rm-gic-%5Boctober-13-2018%5D
MLA
Mickenautsch, Steffen. "Survival rate of ART restorations with high-viscosity GIC versus conventional RM-GIC [October 13, 2018]." Afribary, 6 Jun. 2026, http://library.afribary.com/works/survival-rate-of-art-restorations-with-high-viscosity-gic-versus-conventional-rm-gic-%5Boctober-13-2018%5D. Accessed June 14, 2026.
Chicago
Mickenautsch, Steffen. "Survival rate of ART restorations with high-viscosity GIC versus conventional RM-GIC [October 13, 2018]." Afribary (2026). Accessed June 14, 2026. http://library.afribary.com/works/survival-rate-of-art-restorations-with-high-viscosity-gic-versus-conventional-rm-gic-%5Boctober-13-2018%5D