Cariostatic effect of conventional GIC versus compomers [October 09, 2018]
Subscribe to read and download this work.
Search result: Five clinical trials were found and traced.
Clinical outcomes: The results are conflicting or suggest no difference between conventional GIC and Compomers in regard to their anticariogenic effects after 3-4 years.
[‘Preliminary Systematic Literature Searches’ are based on SYSTEM’s periodic systematic searches of the dental literature and provide first overviews over existing clinical evidence but are limited in the number of databases searched, as well as the assessment of precision and internal validity of results and thus do not replace the need for a full systematic review report to the topic]
Reviews
No reviews yet.
APA
Mickenautsch, S. (2026). Cariostatic effect of conventional GIC versus compomers [October 09, 2018]. Afribary. Retrieved June 14, 2026, from http://library.afribary.com/works/cariostatic-effect-of-conventional-gic-versus-compomers-%5Boctober-09-2018%5D
MLA
Mickenautsch, Steffen. "Cariostatic effect of conventional GIC versus compomers [October 09, 2018]." Afribary, 6 Jun. 2026, http://library.afribary.com/works/cariostatic-effect-of-conventional-gic-versus-compomers-%5Boctober-09-2018%5D. Accessed June 14, 2026.
Chicago
Mickenautsch, Steffen. "Cariostatic effect of conventional GIC versus compomers [October 09, 2018]." Afribary (2026). Accessed June 14, 2026. http://library.afribary.com/works/cariostatic-effect-of-conventional-gic-versus-compomers-%5Boctober-09-2018%5D